• Categories

  • Most Popular Questions

  • Recently Viewed Questions

  • Recent Answers

    How To Make a Digita… on What does a frequency of 100 H…
    Daigrepont on Can an earthquake cause air tu…
    Benedict on How did God come into exi…
    joshua on How does the human body g…
    Ian on How did God come into exi…
  • Recent Questions

  • Blog Stats

    • 2,220,187 hits
  • Visitors since 11-3-08

    counter create hit
  • Terms and Conditions

  • Warning

    We are doing maintenance on this site, so some posts may disappear for a short time. Sorry. Normal service will soon be resumed...
  • Pages

  • March 2008
    M T W T F S S
    « Feb   Apr »
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  
  • Archives

  • Meta

Please can you explain the concept of quantum gravity?

I do not understand the concept of quantum gravity. As mass comes in particles and mass has gravity will gravity not naturally be quatised? If gravity has its own quanta and if this does not coincide with mass quanta won’t we get funny effects? A particle too small to meet the 1 gravity quantum will not have gravity while two might. Am I just being thick?
Nyall Davies from Suffolk (Age 55+)

Advertisements

One Response

  1. Hi there Nyall! The question of quantum gravity continues to stump some of our most clever scientists, so you’re certainly in good company!

    By Einstein’s famous equation, mass is just a form of energy. The thing that gravity couples to is energy, not just mass. For example, photons (i.e. light), which are massless but have energy, are affected by gravity — this is why black holes are black! 🙂

    In fact, the mass of a particle depends on the [quantum] interactions it has with other particles! (The question of `where does mass come from’ is related to something called `Electroweak Symmetry Breaking,’ which scientists hope to study in the near future with experiments at the Large Hadron Collider.)

    Because if this, the relevant thing that gravity `sees’ is the energy of a particle, not just its mass.

    One of the biggest open questions in physics is how to quantise gravity. In Einstein’s picture of gravity, which is experimentally verified on classical and cosmological scales (e.g. on the scales between the size of people and the known universe), gravity is related to the geometry (shape) of the universe.

    However, at a quantum level, we think about forces as being mediated by [quantum] particles. (The technical statement would be that we think of these as “excitations of quantum fields,” but we can ignore this subtlety.) So, just as electromagnetism is mediated by particles called photons (the same particles that make up light!), gravity is mediated by particles called gravitons.

    Gravity, however, is extremely weak! The fact that we can have magnets that pick up paperclips is an example of this. The little magnet can overcome the gravitational force of the *entire Earth* acting on the paperclip. Because of this weakness of gravity, it is impossible to measure gravitons in the lab in the forseeable future.

    This, however, isn’t where quantum gravity becomes problematic.

    From a conceptual point of view, it’s unclear how to reconcile the Einstein picture of gravity as geometry with the quantum picture as gravity as a quantum particle.

    Secondly, even looking only at the quantum picture, gravity ends up being “nonrenormalisable.” This is a fancy word that means that in order to make definite predictions, one would have to make an infinite number of measurements. Part of the problem does, in fact, include the self-interactions of gravity — as you alluded to in your question! (i.e. gravitons themselves emit gravitons…)

    So with regards to the model you’ve described of gravity naturally being quantised, there are a few points to make. Since it’s not the mass of a particle that couples to gravity, but rather the particle’s energy, it’s not quite correct to say that gravity is naturally quantised. Further, the phrase `quantisation’ refers to the discrete excitations of a `quantum field’ forming `particles’ — i.e. what we mean by quantum gravity is that gravity can be thought of as being mediated by graviton particles. The `size’ of a particle doesn’t determine how it interacts with gravitons, just its energy.

    I should note that quantum gravity is seen by many to be the `holy grail’ of theoretical physics. Some people refer to this as a `theory of everything’ because gravity is the only force that has escaped a proper quantum description. Doing so would unite the two major discoveries in physics in the past century (quantum theory and general relativity).

    Currently, the most promising approach to quantum gravity is string theory. But this field is, itself, still very much in its infancy and there’s a lot left for scientists and mathematicians to understand.

    So, once again, you’re in quite good company!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: